Originally Posted by
Chinny Crewman
So aside from claims that the CVR contained nothing contentious why not release the transcript to prove it? Maybe even be open and honest and state why it was redacted in the first place?
They don't become 'claims' just because of a baseless and cruel rumour wrapped-up in a conspiracy theory.
They are, more correctly, called facts:
- I did listen to the CVR.
- I did know the rumours were not true in any way.
- I did know and fly alongside the pilot in question.
- I did salute him at his graveside.
Public Interest is not the same as 'interesting to the public'.