PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Another Robinson crash
View Single Post
Old 10th Oct 2017, 13:46
  #34 (permalink)  
[email protected]
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,329
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
If a machine has a Vne then you should be able to operate it (with due allowance for the Density Altitude on the day using the RFM) up to that figure, without having to take special care or avoid light turbulence in case it falls apart.

If the helo is unsafe at those speeds then the certification was wrong and the Vne and Vno should be revised downwards accordingly.

Of course that doesn't make Robinsons as competitive or attractive as the opposition so doubtless much pressure was exerted on the FAA to accommodate the certification - perhaps like SAC and the S-92's very remote likelihood of oil loss from the MRGB.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline