Torres I reckon you could work out that it is not CASA that prosecutes, its the DPP. If the case assembled by CASA contains rumour and innuendo and little hard evidence then I reckon the DPP would tell CASA not to wast it's time ( and our money!!) thank goodness.
As for the details on UZU - that case like all the others is a matter of Public record - look up the case on the AAT records and everything is there. Shame is that the same dosen't happen in the magistrates court unless there is an appeal, or the matter goes further. So we have to rely on eyewitness reports or the demented ravings of a reporter who has no idea of the ramifications of his inept reporting. But - hey - whats new.
I reckon Phelan geyts it right most times. It would be ideal if Langmead could give us the oil, then we really would have the dinkum. Oh well dream on, poor tossers.
