Originally Posted by
rotor-rooter
Avinco's operational companies, business, staff and management are not implicated in this article’s allegations which specifically refer to Avinco shareholders.
Originally Posted by
Self loading bear
Quick internet search gave following:
In Autumn 2016 Eolia called Avinco holding to court because of strange shareholder transactions, resulting in doubts who was actually managing the 74% Avinco ownership. At same time it was contemplated to liquidate Avinco. Eolia wanted to protect their 26% ownership.
Court put a interim manager in place.
(To be continued)
Avinco is also the company who is to remarket the 21 ex-CHC H225.
https://www.rotor.org/Publications/R...per-Pumas.aspx
For me it is yet unclear on behalf of who Avinco is re-marketing as I do not believe It is 1 leasing company owning all 21.
Cheer SLB
Avinco is mandated to remarket 21 super pumas on behalf of its owners, a banking consortium.