....but the 'terms' were illegal. Is it so wrong for CX to be held to legal account, in every jurisdiction? What about the principle that a country can't 'suspend' the laws for one employer (a precedent like the CX original contract conflicts with what other NZ employers have to abide by). Sorry, I know it makes the issue of bases difficult, but only to a venal, corrupt and malicious management. A management with integrity would structure the bases legally, properly and with a sustainable structure. CX of course preferred to do it 'their' way...hence dozens of lawsuits over the years.