Feel free to copy and paste
there we are, that was easy
But you would prefer a non-tested, very ambitious training system which aims to 'sweat the assets' to achieve the promised efficiencies despite some very obvious shortcomings in its planned flypro generation and 'taxi-rank' system of aircraft availability?
There are some fundamentals of flying training that do not change, however much you apply corporate spin and 'blue-sky' thinking to them and these have been largely ignored by whoever signed up to this.
I may be on the periphery of DHFS but so many people within it have serious doubts about the success of MFTS I am afraid I can't ignore them.
However, in the face of adversity, doubtless a pig-headed refusal to see the obvious will be the position of those in charge and the only ones to benefit from the ensuing mess will be the contract-lawyers.