PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Future Carrier (Including Costs)
View Single Post
Old 3rd Sep 2017, 06:23
  #4457 (permalink)  
Old RN
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: South Africa
Age: 70
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The best (?) example of the use of land based a/c vs. carriers was after UDI in Rhodesia in late 1965. As any good navy the RN proposed a plan (which it started to implement) to move the East of Suez based carrier towards Beira while offloading all aircrew with Rhodesia or South African conections. The plan was to get a carrier and comando force off Beira, to estsblish air superiority over eastern Rhodesia, land the comando by helo on a small airfield, start flying in troops. With a firm base in Rhodesia then take control of Salisbury and end UDI in weeks. Given the very limited state of the Rhodesian military at this point it was very credible.

BUT......

The British Labour government was committed to axing the carriers because "there was no need for them", so the RAF was told to do what they could without carriers. They flew some Javelins into a friendly country, but without much backup support, and achieved nothing except to show how ineffective they were!

Last edited by Old RN; 3rd Sep 2017 at 06:24. Reason: Typos
Old RN is offline