Thanks SM, not quite what I was looking for, but it has triggered alternative thoughts.
The EASA Safety Review focuses on Europe but without evidence of European problems. I have been looking for this - accidents / incidents reports, but if we assumed that the characteristics and contributions in overrun accidents are similar worldwide then there are several review documents, FSF, IATA, and accident reports to consider.
Future safety activities are usually based on past evidence - managing yesterday's risks, but although the same hazards have to be managed, the outcome will be unknown because there will be no absolute value of risk (likelihood x severity).
Furthermore, it might not be sensible to assume worldwide commonality for future activities, particularly as the European approach to risk managing the threat of overrun could differ from other world areas, e.g. requirements for contaminated runway performance - AMC CS 25.1591 is unique to EASA.