Hence it's important for us to understand it, so we may try to prevent future occurrences.
What does circumstantial evidence say? (as the drivers have denied an incident)
All FDR evidence shows they tried to land on the TWY.
Video evidence shows they tried to land on the TWY
Crew denies they were on the TWY.
Crew denies they saw ac on the TW.
CVR not available.
As no incident, no substance testing?
Historically, how many other aircraft have tried to land on TWY C? EVER?
Do you believe the 2 drivers story?
What exactly do you feel will be learned from this?
Not allow visual approach for the other 99.99% that can figure out where the runway is?
Not to trust the drivers, and have 4 hour CVR's?
Have video recorders on the flightdeck?
Not allow visual for AC aircraft?
Exactly WHAT WILL BE LEARNED?
Every criminal in prison professes their innocence.
There was a Delta go-around previous to this on the same night. Are you privy to the reasons for that
Why was that, pray tell?
Perhaps they were behind the AC ac that tried to land on a few other aircraft?
Since you know, why be so coy?