Originally Posted by
Pontius Navigator
If the incidence of VD and the cost of treatment exceeds that of TG then it is indeed a startling situation as it would appear to be tolerated. Such was its debilitating effect that condoms were issued in the Far East and I think VD, and certainly its concealment, was an offence.
Hmmm The above two sentences appear to be contradictory. How can a condition be considered "tolerated" if its presence and especially its concealment "was an offense?"