Hasn't it been established that the flight was cleared for the FMS Bridge Visual 28R? If so, seems that would supersede using the ILS 28R, contrary to Andy Pasztor's assertion.
I believe someone stated earlier in this thread that the FMS Visual 28R could be coupled to autoflight and A/T and track a solid 3D (LNAV/VNAV) path to roll out on final at WP F101D (4.4 DME SFO VOR), which is aligned with the runway at 3.6 nautical miles.
From those of you who have flown this FMS procedure, right or wrong?