Originally Posted by
Heathrow Harry
Very interesting Easy - I'd missed that
Chilcot's Inquiry is full of absolute gems. Having been involved in the planning stage for the capabilities requested/required (Air, Maritime & SF) and how taut they were, I was astonished that the Land component could offer an argument that they had to have a major role - not because of a requirement but just to keep the British Army happy. Worryingly this dangerous folly gained traction and support at the highest levels:
Army morale. “If the Army does not participate in the biggest combat operation for over a decade, and particularly if it is subsequently committed to a potentially enduring aftermath task, this may foster a perception that the Army is no longer regarded as a war‐fighting force (particularly if they are deployed on Op FRESCO duties) and may have knock‐on effects on recruitment and retention. It will clearly present a leadership challenge. This should not be a critical factor in reaching decisions ... but it is an issue which the Secretary of State will wish to have in mind.”
[Page 294]