Originally Posted by
Hebog
As for the CAA saying 'This action is a result of the CAA concluding there were no airworthiness issues relating to the Hawker Hunter aircraft that caused or contributed to the accident' - it did contribute as if the maintenance records had not been fudged and the maintenance companies been honest about it not meeting CAA requirements for a Permit to be renewed it would not have been flying on that day. At the end of the day they have committed fraud by falsely declaring the aircraft meet the CAA requirements when it clearly didn't.
I think you're stretching things a bit, except in the sense that almost every accident investigation could superfluously cite "the aircraft was flying and not on the ground" as a contributing factor.
What airworthiness issues do you consider to have caused or contributed to the accident ?