Originally Posted by
varundatta.hk
I swear to god, if you say the NASA lift thing to a examiner he/she will fail ya!
Just read the PHAK. Don't overcomplicate matters.
I mean, NASA states how PHAK explains lift generation is wrong. And the "circular motion of air" theory of lift is what I find more convincing and scientific.
Anyway, do you mean what I had better do is to just follow PHAK even though some concepts are different from other materials?