Corporate identity
So, it all "kicked off" earlier today when an announcement about AH contracts were made, and the press, as well as the MP for Suffolk North? referred to Wattisham Airfield as RAF Wattisham. Controversial, I know!!
But my question, is this down to a bit of laziness/ignorance (not a big deal imo) or is it that the RAF has a real grasp on corporate identity (Wattisham was handed over to the army in the nineties!) and the Army are really thought of as the Paras/Marines (I know, I know!) and a load of tanks and stuff and not really doing much about it?
Same question re the Royal Navy.
In my opinion the crabs have it nailed, the navy next with the army a very distant third.
RTL