25k documents that is a lot for the CPS to wade through and also if brought to trial, a lot for the defendants team too.
There are things in the report that seem to contradict themselves.
Such as 'the aircraft appeared to be responding to the pilots input' yet later on they state they can't see the pilots input with regard to the variations on the engine. Also,if the G meter wasn't working could the aircraft pulled more than the 3G it was restricted to. How did they test all the aircraft systems/structure as with all the damage incurred and would it be easy to find pre-accident problems among that lot.