The risk assessment -ATRM has no reference to airworthiness - and that is so completely symptomatic of the paper cave that military airworthiness seems to have driven itself into.
Safety case where the data bears no relevance to the actual situation, safety case where the operational staff have no input. Pilots who routinely breach limits and do not report and an institutional approach which is about trying to absolve the regulating authority from responsibility?
Difficult to imagine things being anymore screwed up!
Or are all RAF missions undertaken in aircraft riddled with faults, where the brief is routinely ignored and there is a pile of irrelevant paper?