Pardon me if you couldn't draw something of a parallel between the Air New Zealand
Mount Erebus CFIT, and the current fiasco in Swiss.
In both cases, incorrect navigation data was/is being given to the pilots - data which proved FATAL in the Air New Zealand case, costing that company a great deal of publicity and an enormous conspiracy between company and New Zealand Civil Aviation Authority, as they attempted to blame the (deceased) flight crew for the crash of the DC10.
To draw a comparison for you,
124.8:-
Assume that a Swiss aircraft has an accident operating into one of the destination airports for which these incorrect charts have been issued (or perhaps into one where the inaccuracies are, as yet, undiscovered, and the crew unaware). Following the
Mount Erebus scenario, Swiss would try to blame the crew whilst being KNOWINGLY aware that it was the company's information provided to the crew that caused the fatal errors!
(Sorry chaps...
411A wrote, "
Well lets see...in the last three months we have raised five million, and with meetings this week, fifteen more in the pot, aircraft selected for heavy maintenance, management folks at other airlines have given notice to join our small company, exactly 86 CV's on file from experienced folks looking for work (will need more)...not all that bad, considering." I recall reading similar garbage from you about 3 or 4 years ago,
411, including something like, "
We already have our Chief Flight Engineer picked out....xx number of highly experienced pilot cv's on file...
Be careful the police aren't watching you,
411, they may have you up for public m@sturbation
