PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - AF 447 Thread No. 12
View Single Post
Old 5th Jun 2017, 18:37
  #1446 (permalink)  
KayPam
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: France
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Concours77
In a very real way, the two manufacturers have approached abnormals and manual flight with very different approaches. The sidesticks play no part in passive CRM cues. The wheels do, and score one for B. AB fits no shaker or pusher, having been granted a waiver at certification, (because it won't Stall in Normal Law). Boeing does have these emergency devices.

With an automatic degrade (AB) into an unfamiliar mode, the pilots are at a disadvantage, as the AB flies diferently, and must be controlled with a different protocol.

Stall entry can be completely benign (AB) as the stability "accomodates" departure, instead of emphasizing it, in the interest of notifying the crew that the AC has departed....

What remains in reality is that emergency procedures are almost never needed, so much of the apparent disadvantages are moot.

Except when they're not?
This, on the other hand, is a real problem.
The other real problem is that stall warning stopped when CAS went under 60kt. This design, I don't know if it has been corrected since, is completely against regulations.
KayPam is offline