PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - More KC-46A woes....
View Single Post
Old 31st May 2017, 16:04
  #603 (permalink)  
BEagle
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,829
Received 276 Likes on 112 Posts
The USAF have a requirement for the KC-46A to operate far closer to a threat environment than virtually every other tanker nation. Hence the requirements for systems redundancy, including cable runs etc. are more severe for the KC-46A Pegasus than for the KC-767I or KC-767J.

The KC-46A is also intended to be used as a 'smart tanker', with an associated need for clever comms kit etc., but this isn't a feature of the KC-767I or KC-767J.

A lot of programme delay for the Italian tanker was down to buffet and flutter problems caused by the pods/pylons. Whereas the KC-767J has the 'old-style' boom rather than the latest generation version fitted to KC-46A; the KC-767J is not fitted with wing AAR pods, hence introduction into service with the JASDF was achieved very quickly.
BEagle is offline