PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - More KC-46A woes....
View Single Post
Old 31st May 2017, 01:52
  #599 (permalink)  
CONSO
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: WA STATE
Age: 78
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by precontact
I thought the issue was that the criteria the FAA mandates for separation of critical wire bundles had been updated since the 767 was first certified in the early 80s but Boeing didn't comply with the updated rules for the 767-2C which has many more miles of wiring than a standard 767.

Military EMP shielding issues are much more stringent than FAA requirements. Its MORE than FAA separation and FAA lightning protection requirements. As in a ' nearby ' ( say within 50 miles ) nuke EMP detonation pulse . The basic 767 has ( still ? ) minimum cable controls useable in the event of total loss of electrical power except for a RAT to power a few instruments. ( look up the GIMLI Glider ) tosee how that works ). .Now add FBW style controls for boom, special communication wiring, etc and the ' separation ' issue is the least of the problems.

And ' simply' moving certain wires futher apart is NOT simple- nor adequate to ' fix' - especially in a plane already stuffed and assmbled. re wiring your home AFTER completion would be relatively simple by compariso.

Extra grounding- alternate power paths, and special terminations are a small part of the corrections needed to comply to long standing MIL spec ..

Last edited by CONSO; 31st May 2017 at 02:22. Reason: fat fin ger spelling
CONSO is offline