PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - BAe ATP. What was wrong with it?
View Single Post
Old 8th May 2017, 19:25
  #81 (permalink)  
DaveReidUK
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,826
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by El Bunto
The proposed 3000 - 4000 shp RR turboprop was the RB.510. At one point there was a proposal for a 748 successor using a pair of those engines on a new wing mated to mostly-a-146 fuselage.
I can't imagine why Rolls concluded that wouldn't be a success.

RR now also own Continental, which explains a Cessna 150 I saw the other day with R/R decals on the engine hood!
Er, no they don't. The Chinese have owned Continental for several years:

Teledyne's Continental Motors Unit Sold to Chinese Company


I suspect you are thinking of the arrangement that Rolls-Royce had with Continental to licence-build some of their engine models in the 1960s/70s to power Reims-built Cessnas, including no doubt the one that you saw.
DaveReidUK is offline