Originally Posted by
Capt Kremin
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Sure, so get back to us when you have some actual evidence then.
Originally Posted by
Capt Kremin
The report already contains at least one glaring error when it states that the fuel burn difference between the left and right engines was 1.5T per/hour instead of per flight.
Okey dokey, for starters, the FI is simply quoting from what was written in 9M-MRO's Deferred Defect Log. The authors aren't stating anything, they're quoting what the MAS Maintenance Control Centre had in their records.
Second, do you really think that the right engine would use 1.5T more fuel than the left
per flight!? Under what set of circumstances do you think 1.5T/flight could possibly make sense? It's not like a coin operated kiddies ride, the "flights" are all different durations.
It clearly didn't dawn on you that the MAS MCC made a typographical error and entered a "T" when the correct character should have been a "%"; the T (shift T) and % (shift 5) keys are adjacent to one another.