PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - CARDIFF - 2
Thread: CARDIFF - 2
View Single Post
Old 26th Apr 2017, 12:48
  #2513 (permalink)  
Severn
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South West
Age: 35
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AirGuru
There are no subsidies for this route.

Flights are to begin in 2018, so they should be on-sale in the coming weeks/months.
AirGuru,

You state there are no subsidies for this route; are you able to tell us how you know this?
Can you provide us with the same information that makes you certain that is the case?

You have been very quick (and I suppose rightfully so) to defend why CWL was chosen as the next QR departure point over BRS (and other UK airports). However, you must understand that to those from outside CWL, some are questioning/moaning (and rightfully so) why an airport which in 2016 only handled 1,350,000 passengers (20th out of all UK airports) has now been chosen as the next QR destination?
Just looking purely at statistics, the airports in the UK currently served by QR are Heathrow (1st), Manchester (3rd), Edinburgh (6th) and Birmingham (7th), all of which handle over 11,000,000 passengers per year and have a strong freight market.... CWL just seems to stick out as not aligning with the current QR portfolio of destinations, not only in the UK but in Europe too.

Currently QR serves 34 destinations in Europe, 28 of which handle more than 10,000,000 passengers per year. The smallest destinations QR currently serve in Europe are Skopje (1.7M), Zagreb (2.7M) and Pisa, Belgrade & Sofia all of which handle around 5.0M. They are all capital cities/the main destination in their own countries except Pisa, which although not a capital is a large tourist destination as well as an important city. All of these destations are served by QR's A320s (Zagreb - A321s). My personal view is that CWL doesn't really seem to fit with what is already being served, unless there has been some sort of incentive?

Lastly, I just wanted to go through your list of three points which state the factors in QRs decision. Unfortunately, all three points are not much more than theory/speculation...
1) CWL is more operationally capable for this kind of route due to the runway size?
Here we go again..... Can you explain what you mean please? Have you seen the performance data for A320/A321NEOs or the B788s? You are aware that this year and next TOM will be operating 787-8s direct to Mexico, Florida and the Dominican Republic from Bristols "limited" runway. Sure, these flights are not full with freight but given that Doha is less than 7hrs away from the UK and and Cancun is around 11hrs, so I don't know how you get to this conclusion?

2) APD may be a certain factor
Based on speculation..... Would an airline start a route before something was set in stone, especially something as important as APD...?

3) Qatari's have long expressed an interest in investing in UK infrastructure
Still theory at this stage. I see no reason why an airline such as QR would set up a route because of this? Please enlighten me someone?
Severn is offline