PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - FT interview CEO United. The crucial difference
Old 14th Apr 2017, 09:10
  #28 (permalink)  
Oasis
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: the land of chocolate
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dragon69
But not limited to" is within the scope of Force Majeur. It is not a Carte Blanche for the airline to do whatever it wants with no legal recourse. Otherwise they would not spend time and effort to outline the rules. They could simply say, "we have the right to refuse a passenger at any time with no reason" PERIOD, But of course that would not be allowed by the authorities.



FFS know what the definition of Force Majeur is.

Force Majeur are acts of God, so unless God himself wanted those four crews to travel ISO of the passenger, I am afraid United doesn't have a leg to stand on.



NO they do not have the right to deplane for ANY REASON, and soon you will find out.

Sorry but you are really out to lunch.
You are getting a little too hot under the collar, Mate.
We're having a discussion here and you're getting all fight or flight on me.
No need to swear or call names.

Back to the discussion:

It says in black and white (your quote, not mine):
"force majeure and other unforseeable conditions"
Unfoseeable conditions as in: gee, the crew can't do their job on the next sector if we don't let them bump some passengers off.
Oasis is offline