Originally Posted by
robdean
It's refreshing to see that the United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation is asking very pointedly several of the questions many on pprune have been asking which certain others here have seemed to disdain.
In particular p3 onward:
http://www.pprune.org/attachments/ru...l-incident.pdf
Nice find Robdean. I would suggest that a crucial question is missing though.
Q. When it was decided to include law enforcement to remove Dr Dao, what reason was given for his removal? Were the police simply told that a "disruptive and belligerent passenger needed evicting" or was the full picture given.
It may explain, but not justify, their heavy handedness.