Thank you Engines,
I guess that is about as far as this point will go here. If I take your words at face value, it is a "good job".
However, I have to ask why you use the term "no possibility of the F-35B carrying additional fuel at landing to handle heat loads."? Additional to what fuel, the minimum heat loaded landing fuel of an F-35A or C ? This is a very different thing to saying that the actual minimum landing fuel is independent of operational heat load or environmental circumstances.
OK, I guess we are not going to go much further with this. I still suspect that the F-35B (and the others) has to lug around unusable deadweight cooling fuel.
Just my opinion.
Thanks
OAP