Originally Posted by
FGD135
Yes, this kind of statement does indeed sound a lot like our old friend, "yr right".
If we were left in any doubt, there was also this statement:
No not at all. I was amazed that you could detrime that the prop was at 2000 rpm from what little evidence was aviable at the time. You said simple maths was your answer. Well clearly not at you then changed your next estimation by nearly 25%. Which as i said places the engine into two completely different parameters.
One which would be considered makeing power and the other not.