You're missing the point.
Originally Posted by
Karel_x
The results came too quick and were too wild.
The BEA investigation was released on 16th March last year, nearly a year after the crash.
Yes, they are probable and can be correct.
That's why investigations use the term "probable cause". Any conclusions reached can be subsequently reviewed should any new evidence emerge that wasn't available to the investigators. I'm not aware of that having happened in this instance.
From my point of view, people like Simon are reasonable opposition, forcing investigators not to draw unfounded conclusions.
Are you suggesing that Simon's hubris extends to claiming that he is capable of influencing the conduct or findings of a safety investigation?