PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Air Canada A320 accident at Halifax
View Single Post
Old 3rd Apr 2017, 06:46
  #338 (permalink)  
PJ2
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: BC
Age: 76
Posts: 2,484
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tubby_linton
If the latter is the case then the required flight path angle needs adjusting.
Agreed, but not because of the higher altimeter reading.

A corrected baro altitude places the airplane at the correct FAF crossing height, albeit at a higher altimeter reading. So for practical purposes the geometry is not steeper, it is the same.

If the airplane has GPS or temperature-compensated baro-VNAV, in a Managed RNAV approach, a correct descent path is calculated and flown either by the pilot, (following the flight directors) or the auto-flight system.

If the aircraft doesn't have GPS or a compensated baro-VNAV, a Selected FPA requires correction because the air, being at the same cold temperature all the way down, has a reduced pressure gradient resulting in a reduced altitude change and shallower descent. So the FPA has to be corrected and made slightly steeper.
PJ2 is offline