I don't like the website but I guess they wanted to direct visitors quickly to the destinations on offer, as opposed to facts about the airport (which are irrelevant to most if you can't fly to somewhere you want to go). Probably, they've succeeded if that was the intention.
Unfortunately the errors / failure to update that several of us have posted about with the old website seem to have crossed over into the new. It's been pointed out that maintaining the website is probably the responsibility of someone fairly junior at LSA, but this launch required careful checking, and somebody sufficiently able should have taken responsibility.
How important is all this? Well this website won't make or break LSA. But that's not an excuse for sloppy work. Every little helps as they say elsewhere.
PS Mr Wayfarer, Gran Canaria has been dropped so let's not argue about it.