Originally Posted by
Jay Sata
Most missing persons are found and the rest are dead as they set out to commit suicide.
I'd like to see your research on that.
Originally Posted by
Jay Sata
Using a very expensive publicly funded police resource and personel is not cost effective.
Sorry, what is your mother worth? Or your child? Or your grandmother?
Originally Posted by
Jay Sata
Stolen car chases ,drunk drivers,petty drug dealers etc are also not going to deliver bang per buck with bean counters.
Yes, I suppose you have a valid point, saving lives is not very cost-efficient.
Originally Posted by
Jay Sata
The incessant throb of helicopters over London is a major source of annoyance for those of us who have to spend time in the city.
The incessant drone of journalists is a source of annoyance for those of us with some knowledge or the ability to research a topic fully before expressing an opinion.
Originally Posted by
Jay Sata
The regular political marches can be better policed by drones as can security issues.The reality is that there are many situations where drones can do a better and more cost effective job than a twin turbine helicopter.
Haven't researched drones then either, have we?
Originally Posted by
Jay Sata
Low level power line survey and aerial filming being good examples.
Low level power line survey and aerial filming being poor examples.
Originally Posted by
Jay Sata
The Wattisham police crew can be deployed back in the job and the five pilots can easily find work elsewhere.
And, have you bothered to research what is actually happening to the crews? Here's a clue for you, it's nothing like you suggest.
Having a opinion on a topic is one thing, spouting nonsense after a few minutes on Google, Facebook and Twitter is quite another. If you are a journalist I hope that isn't a reflection of the lazy way you might go about putting together a story.