PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Chinese carriers on 16L/34R
View Single Post
Old 26th Mar 2017, 22:51
  #8 (permalink)  
Tankengine
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sydney
Age: 60
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by aussie1234
I've always thought in this environment of threat and error management, on a purely language barrier reason, why they have airliners with a cockpit crew that one would guess have English as their second language taxi a further distance than nessisary plus cross an active runway that often has a requirement to expedite the crossing. All this while a Saab is landing on the runway right next to international. The computer may slot the 330 or 787 onto 16L/34R after a 10hr flight but can't it be overridden for the sake of common sense?
Beijing sent us on a 30 min taxy crossing an active runway a few weeks ago.
Why delay Aussie carriers (and everyone else) just because you think certain carriers are a problem?
Tankengine is offline