Allthecool
I've made the point about a CEO trying to force an elected government to abandon a vote that was promised to the people. That has nothing to do with the USA.
If you honestly believe that changing the meaning of marriage is the same thing as freeing African slaves, then there is no rational discussion to be had with you.
Yes marriage is exclusive.
As a man I can't join a women's club. If I get the the definition of a "women's club" changed to include men, then it's no longer a women's club. It's now something else. It's not inequality. And it's not the same thing as slavery. You can't use "inequality" to change the definition of every word that you don't like.
Apart from angry rhetoric and use of the word "inequality", the revisionist case has not provided a clear and reasonable definition of marriage beyond saying that if two people want to call their relationship by that name, they should be able to by choice.
Last edited by psycho joe; 26th Mar 2017 at 09:28.