Originally Posted by
Lemain
That is in the report - in a table I think. If you can't find it I'll re-visit tomorrow.
Airpolice has already quoted the part in the report that confirms the camera could not see the altimeter.
You may be thnking of the table at the top of Page 51, immediately following paragraph 1.11.7.4 that you yourself quoted a few posts back, showing the altitude and airspeed parameters recorded by the camera fitted to the Jet Provost that the pilot had displayed the previous weekend.
Some of the report seems a bit wooly and subjective. Crammed with "factoids" but lacking any real conclusion. That's how it seems to me, anyway.
I'd send the report back to the AAIB and ask them to reconsider.
If you don't agree with the AAIB's analysis and findings, that's your right. But citing stuff that simply isn't in the report doesn't really help your case.