Originally Posted by
GavinC
Is anyone else worried about the SIN figures? Don't look good to me.
As this is currently 5x weekly, they are missing 2 of the previous 7 flights.
The average MAN-SIN load is now higher than under the previous MUC tag (noted by LAX_LHR). I don't know what the relative business take up is, but hopefully higher now this sector is non stop.
Onviously the overall performance of SQ 51/52 depends on SIN-IAH and MAN-IAH. Hopefully this is looking good enough to get the route up to daily, although I suspect availability of the A350 might be an issue to consider.