Protections lost....
Thanks for being patient. My understanding is that the report is written and published "to the public".... I don't consider it overly technical, but my expectation is that any "study" undertaken in the investigation would not include "assumptions should be made when the study is incomplete?"
So I consider the THS "study" incomplete.
You state:
"As Machinbird said in an earlier post, the puzzle is why NU movement was not inhibited in alternate law when stall protection became active."
At the risk of tarnishing my non genius status further, aren't "protections lost" in alternate law? IOW, what does "when stall protection became active" have to do with this initial, and ultimately unrecoverable Stall?
And in discussing this wreck, how can the pilots be at fault?
I have to be missing the plot.
Thanks
jmo
(When AP, AT, FDs, and other automated systems are lost, why would one "Automatic System" be retained? THS......)