it's not the AOA's duty to do something about it if he isn't a member in good standing ferchrissakes.
You are arguing something different . The main argument of this thread is whether the AoA should provide assistance, AFTER he has become a member, when he has been a non member all this time.
if somebody f@cks up, twice as it would appear, and is a non member then f@ck em
I don't know the facts and I am fairly certain that you don't either.
Just curious though, and you think it would be ok to defend a member who f@cks up twice? Or should the AoA rewrite the rules to state three strikes and no assistance.
Individuals who took training jobs, or worked on g days prior to the ban were doing what they were entitled to do; morally questionable perhaps, however in the absence of a directive from the membership their right.
Just as it is his right to join under AoA rules, morally questionable, but still his right.