Originally Posted by
Austrian Simon
I don't have more granular data, that's why I remained cautious until Feb 14th even though the statement by AAIU of Feb 12th (no investigation) basically already suggested there was no loss of separation.
On Feb 14th I then got word that the official radar data (in other words the IAA data) confirmed there was no loss of separation (however, I did not get those data, of course).
OK, I won't argue - having learned the hard way, in the context of another discussion, that you don't tolerate any disagreement with your version of events, even if it's to highlight the use of dodgy data.