PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Why Rotor, not Propellor?
View Single Post
Old 12th February 2017 | 17:33
  #20 (permalink)  
CTR
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 300
Likes: 42
From: Texas
Flight Controls Perspective

Working as an engineer in both flight controls and propulsion I have used this discriminator:

If it's primary purpose is solely for propulsion and it dose not have a means for high frequency blade pitch control it is a propeller.

If it's primary purpose is either solely flight control or equally flight control and propulsion, plus it is equipped with a means for high frequency blade pitch control it is a rotor.

Note that on small quad copters that use variable rpm they are called propellers. But on quad copters with collective pitch control they are called rotors.

CTR
CTR is offline  
Reply