PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Ideas that didn' fly
View Single Post
Old 27th Jan 2017, 12:43
  #69 (permalink)  
DHfan
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Derbyshire
Age: 72
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by innuendo
If I am remembering correctly a lot of Lockheed's troubles with the 1011 arose when the RB-211 did not work with the composite materials that were planned for the fan blades.

I believe that problem cost RR a bundle, (and perhaps the UK taxpayers ??) and gave Lockheed a big problem.

I spent some time on the L-1011, primarily the -500 and I thought it was probably the aircraft I enjoyed the most in my time. Not just for the flight crew but the cabin layout we had was something I have not seen since. F/C at least.
To be fair, the composite (Hyfil?) blades worked perfectly, right up until the bird-strike test. That did go extremely badly and, being one of the final tests, was enough to financially break Rolls-Royce.

According to Sir Stanley Hooker, the engine was nothing to write home about anyway. I believe the current RR range of ginormous engines can still be traced back to the replacement RB-211 designed by him and other recalled retirees.
DHfan is offline