PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Future Carrier (Including Costs)
View Single Post
Old 18th Jan 2017, 09:23
  #3929 (permalink)  
Just This Once...
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,166
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Even the USN depend on land-based AAR to project strike packages so it will be no different for the F-35B/QE.

Using the QE class for amphib / littoral / helicopter carry will present the biggest challenge range vs threat conundrum. Nobody has ever used a such a large ship in this role, or one with such reliance on others for self-defence.

The mantra (admittedly flawed) with the QE class was 'steel is cheap, air is free... but weapons are expensive'.

https://youtu.be/ATHhsrH16VQ

Last edited by Just This Once...; 18th Jan 2017 at 09:35.
Just This Once... is offline