Strange that the aircraft in question has been flying more or less continuously since the day after the incident.
Don't think there's anything 'strange' in that. The engineers seem to have done what the ground maintenance manual told them to do. Followed by full inspection.
No story!
Had the flight crew done what they're not trained to do. With customers on board. Then gone flying after the aircraft had departed the paved surface. With no inspection....
Then that's a story!
This aviation business really ain't that tricky if you break it down into bite sized pieces, eh?!