I take your point. I do not believe the data should be published without regard to its audience.....I do however take note of who is first on scene, who decides a course of action, and who are the "invited parties."
Government agencies, airframe manufacturers, engine manufacturers, end of.
All of the above have varying degrees of conflict. From the outset of most accidents, conflicts are rampant. To say that the usual agencies have no bias, and are completely objective, is to invite a chuckle.
I don't speak for any other than myself, but it occurs to me the occasional "ombudsman" would be welcome.
Boeing/pencil whipped skin inspections. Boeing/confidential logs: lithium batteries
Rolls Royce/test bed explosions: Trent. Airbus/ g data Habsheim.
Incomplete data relative to any accident invites suspicion... Transparency and disclosure are missing; the customer is compelled to "Trust, don't verify".
My position is not a popular one...or not?