It's all just a case of being methodical. The information is out there and some of the pointers from posters on here has been invaluable. There are still many lines to look at yet. :-)
As for legal action, well, there are no direct claims on here that cannot be supported by factual evidence. If TCT wants to play ball then so be it - her opening gambit of "I never intended to mislead" will be blown out of the water with just one video, supported by the e-mail from the Telegraph and the Women's Institute statement; all nicely overlaid on the "Alone in an open cock-pit" (sic) powerpoint slide. That's all before we get started on the back-story which shows her penchant for embellishment and clouding the real story. I have quite a collection of historical screenshots that show the rate of website editing (BiaB and Wiki page) once the story broke.
We can then look in great detail at the Robinson munching and desert crunching "incidents" which, like all of this, are shrouded in vague TCT generated stories, before closing with the fact that a majority of her peers decided 2:1 to rescind one of her awards as they saw through the charade, and that was BEFORE they saw her own lies at Herne Bay ( I really do wonder how the vote would have gone had that been available to the LAA).
Will it ever come to that? I don't know,personally I would hope not because it would not end well for her but at least we would get the answers to our questions under oath.
All we ask are the answers to the questions I shall repeat again below. There is no shame in showing some contrition. Once those are answered then the awards standing or being removed would be between TCT and the organisations in question to resolve.
-What is the reconciliation between Ms Curtis-Taylor's well documented claim to have flown her African flight "solo" (Please see the video clip published earlier in this thread in which she personally makes that claim) and her subsequent public statement that the flight was not solo?
-Given the above, what was she doing in the picture of her published earlier in this thread standing in front of a huge picture claiming she had been "Alone in an open cock-pit [sic] plane"?
-By what authority, and with what qualification, does she wear RAF wings?
*******
In addition I would like answers to the following
- When exactly did the sponsorship requests begin?
- What did the investors THINK they were getting?
- When was it decided that these would not be a solo flights?
- Why was the solo aspect dropped?
- Were the sponsors informed of this material change?
- If so, when?
- Why was it felt necessary that the front seat would be occupied for the vast majority of the journey by Ewald?
- What steps did TCT take to correct the many SOLO headlines?
- Where is the evidence to show this even happened?
- Why, many months after the return to the UK, was TCT perpetuating the SOLO claim?