Hilarious. I have no clue where you get that 50% figure from but if it is from this website (and there is literally no other reference to this value), everybody can see how much meaning this values really have:
https://www.macroaxis.com/invest/mar...Major_Airlines
https://www.macroaxis.com/invest/rat..._Of_Bankruptcy
https://www.macroaxis.com/invest/rat...-Of-Bankruptcy
You have no clue what these values really mean and what they are used for, you just pick what suits your agenda and disregard the rest. You have no ability or willingness to engage in a non polemic factual debate without name calling, all you can do is reiterate an opinion in the same words again and again without any background knowledge or ability to back it up when challenged. And its annoying, because while certainly not everything is perfect and there are things which are debatable or need improvement, this extreme negative bias against Norwegian, especially on this forum, is completly unjustified, both for SH and LH.
Maybe you should get your head out of the sand. The airline industry is about to get heavily disrupted any no crying and whining by unions and legacy airlines will stop it now that it has been proven that you can create a competitive longhaul lowcost product and slash fares in half on the north atlantic. If Norwegian will survive and flourish, time will tell, but I think (personal opinion) that before we will see Norwegian fail, at least one big name will fall and vanish because they will be slow to adapt to the fast changing market.