Sunfish, it is not possible to move forward in a relationship whilst one or both of the parties are looking backwards. I have read the ASSR - I just read the ES again - are we reading the same document? I also took the time to read the Governments response. I note that it says (page 1):
"Australia’s aviation safety regulatory approach should continue to reflect the level of risk attached to the different types of aviation operations and the likelihood and consequences of aviation safety accidents and incidents." and (page 2)
"These recommendations recognise that industry plays a vital role in helping to develop and maintain a modern, safe and appropriate aviation system in Australia." and
"The Government therefore strongly encourages our aviation agencies and industry to work closer together to identify aviation safety risks and ensure that the best methods, practices and technologies are adopted to address these risks" and
"Industry is urged to take up and constructively contribute to these processes, acknowledging that for both CASA and industry, regulatory development requires the commitment of ongoing resources.
Consistent with the Government’s deregulation agenda, completion of the regulatory reform program will also carefully consider how regulatory burdens on industry can be reduced without impacting on safety."
Democracy works when you hold a Government to account for its statements.
The foregoing statements supports the approach to medicals for private pilots that has been adopted in the UK and US.
CASA will remain the beast that you describe unless the voices at its walls reach a crescendo that brings down those walls.