We have to assume the ERA findings are correct (until proven not to be...) as they challenge the assertion that a simple change of similar parts cures the problem.
I am waiting to hear AH's full detailed explanation on the exact cause for the problem....not the evidence of the problem....but the actual cause of the problem.
Perhaps I missed something over the past year or so but I am not sure they have done that in a degree or level...that would allow for a "Peer Review" process by a completely independent third party.
Then....I want them to fully explain why the current methodology for "catching" impending failures is sufficient to provide timely and completely unambiguous warning of an imminent failure. (Like....at the end of a flight and prevent future flights with the pending failure.)
Anyone disagree with that kind of "Soul Bearing" by AH?