then I would imagine you would more think the ECAM is wrong vs the QRH SUMMARY APPCH section.
Well, not me - honestly. I would think "thank you QRH summaries for giving this advice which was not included in STATUS". The whole idea that the instruction is actively missing on STS
on purpouse and thus ECAM and QRH are in disagreement would not dawn on me at all.
The next question would be, did Airbus omit the logical split slats/no slats by mistake(*) or for a reason?
* = and are we first to find out just yesterday, with 1000 A/C built? Somehow I do not think so.