MSOCS, your generalisation about those posting here generalising about the RAF is noted. The generalisation that I proposed, reference the attitude of the RAF High Command, is borne of the continuing cover up by said High Command of the illegal orders and actions of certain VSOs in the late 80s/early 90s that effectively sabotaged the provision and maintenance of UK Military Airworthiness ever since.
A bandwagon? Perhaps, but if it illustrates a tendency of those in the RAF High Command to not rock the boat, even if the very foundation of the RAF is at stake (ie the airworthiness of its aircraft whether past, present, or future), then the attitude of Haraka's VSO may well not be that unique at all.
That's the tendency I see, BV.